Springfield and Greenfield Sessions
NAEMT’s Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) course, is a comprehensive 16-hour, evidence-based training designed to prepare EMS practitioners, prehospital providers, first responders, and allied personnel to effectively assess and manage traumatic injuries in civilian tactical and high-risk environments.
WRHSAC is conducting two sessions of this 2-day training.
The first in Springfield on Saturday and Sunday, February 14 & 15, 2026. 9am to 5pm.The second in Easthampton on Wednesday and Thursday, March 4 & 5, 2026. 8am to 4pm- Training Update January 9, 2026 – Both sessions and the waitlist are full. Thank you for your interest in the training.
This course equips participants with the knowledge and hands-on skills necessary to deliver life-saving care during dynamic incidents such as active shooter events, mass casualty situations, and other tactical emergencies.
What You’ll Learn:
-
A structured approach to trauma care using the three phases of tactical care — Direct Threat (Hot Zone), Indirect Threat (Warm Zone), and Evacuation (Cold Zone).
-
Techniques for hemorrhage control and immediate action drills including tourniquet application.
-
Application of the MARCH assessment for rapid evaluation and intervention.
-
Airway management, including surgical airway control and needle decompression.
-
Strategies for caring for responders and patients in hostile or unstable environments.
-
Pediatric trauma care, casualty movement techniques, and real-world patient simulations culminating in a mass-casualty/active shooter event scenario.
Course Benefits:
-
Accredited by CAPCE for 16 hours of continuing education.
-
Recognized by the National Registry of EMTs (NREMT).
-
Endorsed by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma and aligned with current Co-TECC guidelines.
Whether you are an EMS clinician, firefighter, law enforcement officer, or other emergency responder, this course strengthens your ability to act confidently and competently when every second counts.



Following a school shooting or ideological attack, we often wonder if there were warning signs that we missed. We think we know what a typical shooter looks like, but do we really? Is there even such a thing as a “typical” shooter?